[ CYPHER CODE #1426 ]
The subscription scam only works if silence gets treated like consent.
[ CYPHER CODE #1427 ]
Italy didn't just hit Netflixâs prices. It hit the contract trick behind them.
[ CYPHER CODE #1428 ]
The fine print only wins when customers are too busy to fight it.
BRIEFING
Grant here. Netflix has been hiking up prices for years now, and it's become so constant that it's practically a generally accepted reality. They raise the prices, and we groan about it, maybe contemplate cancelling, but in the end many of us just silently accept the hike. But Italy just said "not so fast" to Netflix's latest price hike. And they didn't just complain, they literally read the fine print, brought it to the courts, and won. Now Netflix's entire price hike model is at stake. Letâs break it down.
A Rome court recently ruled that Netflixâs price-hike clauses in Italy were unlawful because they allowed the company to change subscription prices without stating a valid reason in the contract. The court voided those clauses, ordered refunds for affected customers, and required price reductions going forward. Reuters reports that some continuous Premium users could get roughly âŹ500 back, while Standard users could receive around âŹ250.
Not too surprisingly, Netflix has stated they will appeal.
SOURCE
A Rome court has ruled as unlawful price increases imposed by Netflix (NFLX.O), opens new tab âon its Italian subscribers over the last seven years, and has ordered the U.S. media giant to reimburse them, a consumer association said on Friday.Consumer group Movimento Consumatori said in a statement that the court had upheld âits lawsuit against Netflix Italia and deemed unfair clauses that allowed subscription price increases âfrom 2017 to January 2024.Netflix said in a statement that it would appeal â against the court's decision. "We take consumer rights very seriously and believe our terms have always âcomplied with Italian laws and practice," it added.The court held that âthe clauses were unfair because, in breach of the national Consumer Code, they allowed changes to be made without stating a valid reason in the contract.The ruling said each subscriber would be entitled to a reduction in âthe current subscription price, reimbursement of sums unduly paid and, where applicable, compensation.
DEBRIEFING
And that right there may be the real danger for Netflix and every other subscription platform watching this unfold. The issue isn't just one court order or one pile of refunds. It's that the entire subscription model is being challenged in public.
If courts and regulators start deciding that passive acceptance is not real consent, then a lot of these companies are going to have to do more than just tweak the email wording.
NOW YOU KNOW
The real threat to Netflix isn't just the refund bill. It's courts deciding that âcancel if you wantâ isn't a valid excuse to price gouge.
Share your opinion
COMMENT POLICY: We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, hard-core profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment!
I dropped Netflix because they are Grooming children to be Gay and Trans. There are greedy and vile people running Netflix, when more see their true nature, more will stop giving them their money.
100 percent, cancelled long ago with no plans to return
Talk about price gouging; how many have received the news from Amazon that they will not be supporting your Kindle that works just fine? No matter your device has no cracked screen, no dead battery, downloads your newly purchased Kindle e-books with no problem, if it was manufactured after 2012 Amazon has decided you need to buy a new one. Amazon support including downloading new books ends in 6 weeks so best purchase a newer one.
The author must be a socialist. In a capitalist system, a company does not need to justify why it raises or lowers prices. You as a consumer have a right to not use the company’s goods or services or to keep using their services. You as a consumer also can decide that you don’t want to use their [product because you don’t like the fact that they didn’t justify their price hikes.
But that’s not what you are advocating. You tout what Italy has done as a good thing. In you case, a central authority gets to decide whether Netflix and raise prices based on an argument from Netflix justifying their price increase. This takes decision-making away from consumers and puts it in the hands of centralized nameless, faceless bureaucrats who may or may not have your best interests at heart when they exercise their bureaucratic decision-making.
A great US example is apartment rent-control. Perhaps in their minds the bureaucrats justify centralized control over rents instead of allowing markets to drive pricing. This has and continues to be a horrible set of policies that end up hurting the very people it is trying to protect.